Quote:
Originally Posted by mshnayde
So what's everyone's take between 28002 and 28005.
Is 28005 actually faster. I haven't done any testing but from personal use seems to be about the same except more of a battery hog. Would love to know what others think.
|
mshnayde, I'm glad you ask this because I was going to post and ask myself. I have been using 28002 and like it very much. It seems fast and responsive, but does work on the batteries a bit (I do sync email using an exchange server, which drains batteries faster). I have not tried out 28005 as of yet, but I'm thinking of doing so. I like 28002 so much I don't really see a need yet. If anyone else has compared both 28002 and 28005, please do provide some feed back for us.