View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2009, 04:30 AM
tpeazy's Avatar
tpeazy
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Location: Sunny Southern Cal
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 378
Reputation: 585
tpeazy knows their stufftpeazy knows their stufftpeazy knows their stufftpeazy knows their stufftpeazy knows their stufftpeazy knows their stuff
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: TP2 & TP1 Are The Same Spec Wise, Why Is The TP2 So Much Better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EGOvoruhk View Post
The CDMA versions look awkward when you compare them, because of the added GSM support. The GSM versions are easier to compare:

http://www.htc.com/us/product/atttil...ification.html
http://www.htc.com/us/product/htcfuz...ification.html



No it's not, it's just AT&T trying to market it. The T-Mobile is GSM, and it's called the Touch Pro2. It's also called the Touch Pro2 in Europe as well

Also, the original AT&T Tilt is not based off of the Touch Pro. It's based off of the TyTN II/Kaiser/P4550



I was saying that the TP1 and TP2 run the same chipset, and HTC specifications I just posted prove that
I agree that the Tilt is just a marketing gimmick...just a name. But the CDMA versions use a newer chipset then the original. So just to be clear...The Sprint/Verizon TP2s have a newer chipset then the Sprint/Verizon TP's and also then the GSM/WCDMA ATT Tilt2 and T-Mobile Touch Pro 2.

That is a fact. The GSM side of the aisle got screwed on this one.

Tp
__________________
I'm letting my ROM do the talking...."Xpress-your-cell" DUSK ROM.
Reply With Quote