View Single Post
  #19317 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2009, 04:45 PM
Christophe418's Avatar
Christophe418
Lurker
Offline
Location: Quebec
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Reputation: 0
Christophe418 is a n00b
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: |H|ROM|6.5.3|WWE| ** EnergyROM 'Photon' (28002/21869) |Nov21| Sense 2.1 and 2.5

Thank you for your responses _sandman, tkedch and ThreeFaces!

Quote:
Originally Posted by _sandman
preferable people who want no glitches prefer the 21xxx builds

212xx = AKU1, all builds leading up to and including WM 6.5
213xx = MOT Motorola
214xx = ????
215xx = SAM Samsung
216xx = HTC
217xx = COM1, continuing dev of 6.5.0.1 – 6.5.0.40
218xx = COM2, continuing dev of 6.5.0.50
219xx = MD, feature branch (unstable features are added here, backported to 218xx – this tree is based on COM1, so older base os code, but the UX code is newer [user experience])
22xxx = SEMC Sony Ericson
230xx = COM3, continuing development of 6.5.0.60
234xx = COM4, continuing development of 6.5.1
236xx = LG Electronics
28xxx =
COM4, continuing development of 6.5.3
Thank you for adding 28xxx!

Ok, do I understand that the more "xxx", the higher the development is done on this version "28"?
So 28002 is very new?

Now what is a COMx ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vernonlbrown
28004 and 21876 ROMs uploading today from NRG's twitter

Don't know if it is for us but we will see.

I also believe that 28004 is for us since he was speaking in twitter!
Do you think the 28004 version might solve the problem of black screen with our CDMA HTC Touch Pro?

Quote:
ThreeFaces : I typically run a stable build on my device for daily use and then flash the new stuff to play with it. Eventually, the new stuff catches up to the stability of the old and then I just stick with it.
With what are you changing too rapidly version for fun? Spb Clone? It seems to me that many configurations to change ROM from time to time?

Quote:
tkedch: If you really like 6.5.3 layouts you can try earlier 23xxx builds with 2.5, but if you want stability go with the latest 21869.
I tried the 23504 previously and it seemed pretty stable too, but perhaps slower than the 28002. Any decision to take ... I'll try to compare the benefits me and decide on a version ... Just after having tested 28004!

Chris
Reply With Quote