View Single Post
  #345 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2009, 01:39 PM
indagroove's Avatar
indagroove
AWOL
Offline
Threadstarter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Reputation: 120
indagroove is keeping up the good workindagroove is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: indagroove's Sense 2.5 TouchPro ROM - CE OS 5.2.23506 (Build 23506.5.5.0) [111609

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmajewsk View Post
Well that's one issue inda has to work out - NAMING his compressed files appropriately. Take a page out of NRG's book and name the file with the Windows Mobile version+build date+version of Manila...the way Inda does it is amateurish, and not descriptive.

But yes, pulling down the link over at ED/TP - I am not getting the 11/16 version...yeah I embedded the link ...get over it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by x10guy View Post
I think Indagroove reads this thread.... you don't have to keep brining it up. If you prefer NGR's naming of his ROMS, that's fine. But I you are going a bit far calling his naming "amatueristic".
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmajewsk View Post
Just calling it what I think it is, and I hope he doesn't take offense as I don't intended any - just some constructive criticism. That's all. I hope he reads this thread. After all, it's his ROM. He can take the advice and use it or not. I am just offering it to be helpful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rootlinux View Post
It would be easier if they had dates in the filee name.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmajewsk View Post
Ah there's someone who gets it. Thanks root!
Quote:
Originally Posted by sensaye View Post
your point was easily understood but you didnt have to use the the term amateurish to describe the way he named it becuase it didnt fit your taste . In good tatse you should have just mentioned your suggestiion on dating the roms so they could be easilly recognized by all as most recent .
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmajewsk View Post
Agreed, and my apologies. Again, I did not intend to offend anyone. Most of all Inda, and his work which is always is excellent!
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmajewsk View Post
In any event, the only file I can seem to download for this ROM is from 11/15 7:53PM. Does anyone have the most recent?
Hehe, you guys are funny!

So, believe it or not, there is a reason that I've been leaving the date out of the file names lately. I used to give each DL link a name with the release date, and then had to change the DL link is 4 different threads at 4 different sites that I support my roms at. I've been getting lazy lately, and now have the threads all point to ED/TP, so that I don't have to update the links as much. Now, I've been getting even lazier and figured that if I just leave the same file name I don't have to update the links at all. Basically I can just upload the new build on the ftp, and once the upload is complete rename the files and as soon as someone downloads they will have the new file -- no waiting for me to have the time to update my threads.

One thing you will find about me is that I often upload and update rom threads prior to the actual date. For example the [111609] release I built on 11-15-09, tested during the day, and uploaded in the evening. This started happening because I update so often, and has in the past had more that one update in the same day, so you do you name the roms then? I guess you could do [111609am] and [111609pm], but seriously don't get so hung up on numbers. Just flash the rom and see.

As far as being amaturisticratic, that's just silly. I've supported literly hundreds of rom builds at this site, so I may be sloppy sometimes, but I do have a pretty good idea of what I'm doing. I wasn't offended, just think it's funny.

Happy flashing!

Last edited by indagroove; 11-16-2009 at 01:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 5 times.