View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 08:19 PM
Malatesta's Avatar
Malatesta
Moderator/WMExperts Staff
Offline
Location: NY
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,413
Reputation: 3635
Malatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: TP2, best battery life of WM devices?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackietreehorn View Post
Out of curiosity, did you use 6.1 at all (or for long) before 6.5? I'm just curious about how much difference people are seeing between 6.1 and 6.5 with similar usage (I know it won't tell me a whole lot about stock 6.5 whenever Sprint gets around to releasing it, but...meh).

Really, asking anyone who has used 6.1 on it and moved up to 6.5, any thoughts?
I've used a ton of devices recently and I've just noticed that WM6.5 gets very good battery life in general.

Unfortunately I haven't had a stock 6.1 vs a stock 6.5 on the same device--closest was the Treo Pro, but that has a hacked 6.5 ROM which was better on battery--all though that it my opinion/experience and I didn't test it directly.

Assuming the WinMo team isn't lying (lol), WM6.5 is optimized for battery and memory usage and at least unofficially, that feels accurate when using them.
__________________
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 1 times.