[dbldwn02]

Originally Posted by lefty11

your reasoning is baffling. I think this is incredibly simple and I think you are on the wrong side of the argument here. I think there may be a moral issue ( not morale) that is bothering you and that is understandeable. A person sees a mistake made by another person/company and uses it to his or her advantage. Ok. If you wanted to preach morals , join the ministry. I cannot fault you on that issue but to argue like you have is silly. Sprint posted a publicly accessible weblink offering a phone for a discounted price. At no point in the screening/checkout process did it ask if you are an employee, ask for an employee email address, ask for an employee id , or anything else related. Therefore, Sprint did nothing to verify or screen buyers of the phone at this price, period. It would have taken a good software engineer or web developer about two minutes to incorporate a simple screening or preauthorization question to filter buyers. It is incumbent on Sprint to do this when this was public. You may have a moral issue with this, but there was no need to take it to the level you say. I wonder have you ever been given too much change back at a store after buying something, gotten home before you realized it ? Did you bother going back to the store after you were already home?? Doubt it,,,maybe when I am at the counter but not after getting home. Cmon, get outta the glass house .

Well put. You made my arguement sound like a 2nd grade cat fight. Haha