Quote:
Originally Posted by achqm5
I think we can all agree, even though it may be bad for sprint business wise, that TPs will eventually be replaced with TP2s. Just a matter of time.
Here's how the path that I took to get to where I am now.
First phone: Treo 700. I broke the Screen. Filed a claim through TEP.
Second Phone: Asurion replaced Treo 700 with Treo 755. Woke up one morning to the bootloader screen and the phone being completely unresponsive (this was before I started customizing or flashing or anything.) Took it to the Sprint store and they were out of Treo 755s completely.
Third phone: The sprint store told me I could pick out any phone in the store as a replacement because they were completely out of Treo 755s. So without knowing anything about Windows Mobile or the phone, I chose the Mogul. So year and a half or so later, I break the screen on my Mogul.
Fourth phone: Asurion replaced my Mogul with a Touch Pro. I am now on my 4th Touch Pro all because of dead keyboards.
Treo 700-->Treo 755-->Mogul-->Touch Pro.
|
You're right, I don't think there is any arguing your point. The argument seems to be people want to replace the TP with the TP2 NOW, and some people have different reasons as to why. I don't see why Sprint is putting up such a hassle. I had the Treo 800w, the sound quality was terrible, couldn't hear the other person talking if there was any kind of background noise, hell sometimes when it was dead quiet...checked the threads of several BBs and notice this was a common defect. I get 2 replacements for the 800w's, always the same issue. Got to the point where I didn't have faith in the 800w so I asked sprint to send me a touch pro, which they did no problem. Fast forward to today, I'm on my 4th TP, all based on the same issue with the keyboard no longer working. Needless to say, I've lost faith in the TP and believe the next one they send me will do the same thing, so how about replacing the TP with the TP2 which seems to have the keyboard issue resolved? Nope, Sprint would rather have a frustrated customer with a defective phone who according to sprint should be happy because his monthy plan is lower than the competitors.
Oh, and the argument against this in this thread seems to be, hey suck it up, deal with it and spend the money
