Thread: Quick question
View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2009, 09:57 PM
pyro254750's Avatar
pyro254750
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Location: Woodstock, GA
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 314
Reputation: 535
pyro254750 knows their stuffpyro254750 knows their stuffpyro254750 knows their stuffpyro254750 knows their stuffpyro254750 knows their stuffpyro254750 knows their stuff
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to pyro254750 Send a message via MSN to pyro254750
Quick question

Theres alot of talk of wm 6.1 vs wm 6.5, and ive had both, and ive come to love wm 6.5 and titanium. What im trying to figure out is, while we all know that ATM wm 6.5 is at best, as stable, but im most cases, less stable than 6.1, why is it that so many people insist on running wm 6.5 with manilla, when manilla was designed for 6.1. Is there another advantage aside from titanium and the lockscreen? I know the start menu has been restructured, but it seems with all the problems ive seen with manilla running under 6.5, that if you wanted to run manilla, youd be better off sticking with a stable 6.1 rom.

Im not trying to rant or tell people what to do, so please dont take it that way. im merely trying to understand the fascination with 6.5 for those who use very few of its features that make it different from 6.1.
Reply With Quote