View Single Post
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2009, 03:30 PM
boredandtattooed's Avatar
boredandtattooed
The Dyslexic VIP
Offline
Location: MI
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,219
Reputation: 6117
boredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the communityboredandtattooed is a trusted member of the community
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to boredandtattooed Send a message via MSN to boredandtattooed Send a message via Yahoo to boredandtattooed Send a message via Skype™ to boredandtattooed
Re: Back of Sprint touch pro 2 is the ugliest of them all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by themuffinman View Post
Yes it was removed and that link showed concrete proof since it was the official specs right? I guess you won't believe anything until you see the actual phone with your own two eyes.
yes the link showed exactly what the OP copy/pasted...it was all over news sites how sprint was betrayed by someone on their developer site... he just happens to be a PPCG... go ask the OP of that post... my link is good... his link in his post to sprints site is what got removed... if i were sprint id pull it down too after that..

i dont care if it has it or not, i prob wont even get the phone... im just asking for proof... your pics dont back up your claim... my evidence, does show that its not listed in the specs from Sprint itself
__________________
Sprints new slogan should be " Whether its a Early Upgrade or charges for nothing, We'll be there"
Reply With Quote