Quote:
Originally Posted by Noir
but thats the problem too
she made it seem as if the touch pro 2 (besides better keyboard) remained relatively the same. She didn't go nearly in depth with the changes of touch flo 3d2, glazed over the fact that htc used all it could do to not make people recall the windows mobile experience, no opera information, picture comparisons, there was a lot lacking in this review that other sites (pocket now, phone dog, ppc italia just to name a few) hit on that bonnie didn't.
And in fact in the other touch pro reviews she hit on those points and those intricacies in the brevity of her summaries. This was just feeling meh in comparison to the others...
|
While the review wasn't the most detail, the biggest thing that made me feel empty is how the points were ignored.
She stated the Good and the Bad and the review is suppose to throughly explain why this is the case. She mentions in the Bad the the phone has low onboard memory..but in the review she never even touches that topic...
That I would already consider not professional. It is like when writing an essay and mention things in the introduction paragraph and then never get back to them in the body paragraphs.
So now as a reader it leaves me wandering...low enough memory for what? what kind of memory?
Personally if I were not to research it further and only read that review, my impression would be how the really old HTC phones were stuck with barely enough memory to run applications. That is the impression the review makes on me.
That is my biggest problem with it, if a review doesn't have enough info look else where but if a review is vague and no other review focuses on this topic It gives you a feeling like maybe your missing something and leaves uncertainty.
________
Kidney disorders forums