I have to say this is pretty amazing to me.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/13/droid-2-review/
Mean while the iphone 4 got a 9/10 review. WTF is up with this site. I already know that cnet gives all good phones a 4/5 stars(they literally never give more, meaning a 4/4 is a perfect score I suppose). But a 6 out of 10.
Moto fixed the keyboard, gave it as much power as any phone available, and changed the design up more then the 3G into 3GS ever did. They send the whole time saying how the phone is small (3.7, pretty standard, not everyone wants 4.3) and critizing the camera. Using these standards, what would ally get if put to the same grading scale? I'm thinking 3 out of 10.