PPCGeeks

PPCGeeks (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/index.php)
-   Windows Mobile Hacks/Tweaks (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Common NAM Performance Tweaks. (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=11610)

itsall_cooool 01-26-2008 04:41 PM

I want to hear about the girl in pink !

buckyswider 03-13-2008 12:37 AM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by otacon72 (Post 150888)
I figured out why I couldn't use the "MSL"... they gave me the one-time-use number. I did the ATDbg dump file tweak and found my real MSL...

Although I've noticed, the one-time-use MSL will always work to change your MDM and MSID...just won't work to access the ##788#... just glad I figured it out...

So can somebody point me to theis "ATDbg dump file tweak"? I can't get into edit with the computed MSL from the "MSL Generator" (I tried using results from both uppercase and lowercase) nor the default '000000'....

Thanks!

spotter 11-10-2008 05:12 PM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
I just noticed that my ACCOLC is 0 (my number ends in 0) on my Sprint Touch Pro. If one can't choose 0, how can that be?

snovvman 11-10-2008 10:43 PM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spotter (Post 509698)
I just noticed that my ACCOLC is 0 (my number ends in 0) on my Sprint Touch Pro. If one can't choose 0, how can that be?

Oops, hit "Thanks" on accident. Free one for you :-)


It appears to be mis-information that access overload 0 or 1 is reserved for emergency, etc. In reality, 0 or 1 is like any other digits 0 through 9. In the old days, the ACCOLC value is essentially the last digit of the phone number.

There are those who say that access overload is no longer used under CDMA/1x. There are also those who say that a class of 10 or above are reserved for techs, emergency, and government. All I know is that I can't set my ACCOLC value to anything other than 0-9. This leads me to believe that if ACCOLC is actually used, it requires special provision to allow the phone to be configured to anything above 9.

I read through CDMA white papers, and it appears that ACCOLC is a POSSIBLE feature, but would only be valid if the carrier supports it.

ChronoT52 11-13-2008 06:27 PM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
I have a Touch Pro, and mine was set to 1 by default. My guess is it's either not supported on Sprint or the suggestion that 10 may be for emergency use.

hippity.hoppity 11-14-2008 02:34 AM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChronoT52 (Post 517408)
I have a Touch Pro, and mine was set to 1 by default. My guess is it's either not supported on Sprint or the suggestion that 10 may be for emergency use.

Not used by Sprint. The value should be the last digit of your phone number.

RaydogPR 11-16-2008 10:09 PM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
my Sprint phone ends in 1 so I went ahead and checked and low and behold my ACCOLCwas at 1 so I just left it alone

bmxmike 11-17-2008 01:55 AM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
Description of the ACCOLC.

Saw this and got kinda confusing so did some research of my own...Not sure how true this is but what i gathered.

It's primarily for controlling the reverse control channel link.
Each of the 16 values (0 to15) on the phones corresponds
to a flag bit In the "overload control global action message "
There is a total of 16 flag bits in the Global action message.

It is not hierarchical!

When a flag bit is set high, the phones with that ACCOLC setting
will be in serve mode.
They will place calls when the user request.

When the bit is low, the phone will not accept a call request from the user.
When a user request a call, the phone will respond with the fast busy
signal.

Any of the flag bits can be high or low, with no correlation to other bits.

If the 16 bit control word is, 1010-0000-0011-1111.
Only phones with the ACCOLC of 1, 3, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16
will accept request for placing a call.

It doesn't have to restrict the phones based on a hierarchical system.
(ie) It can allow level 1 access while disallowing level 5 access.

Incoming calls are regulated by the cellular network.
The phone still monitors the control channel for incoming calls and
new global action messages, but it will refuse to accept a call request
from the user.

The practice of using the last digit of the phone number will evenly
distribute the current users into 10 groups.
When incoming request grow beyond capacity, the control channel
can basically disable users in 10% increments.
It is up to the control station to rotate the blackout among the
10% chunks that reside on each overload class.
Or the control station can lock out a group, or all groups
for as long as it wants.

Presumably with bit 10 in the high condition all the time to
allow emergency personnel unrestricted access.

When you dial 911 on an AMPS, CDMA, TDMA, GSM phone, it will
ignore the global action message and proceed to initiate a call
as soon as the control channel finishes serving the current phone
that it is talking with.
That is why you have a setting on AMPS
(and newer) phones
for the emergency number.
When you dial that number, it will ignore any ACCOLC or global action
messages, and it proceed to initiate the call .

The ACCOLC is supported on AMPS, TDMA, CDMA, and GSM.
It is used for a different purpose in the UK for GSM phones
but it still has the same 16 bit control system.
And no modifications have to be made to the phone
for it to work on the US system or the UK system.

When you get a recording that all lines are busy on the cell phone,
Then ACCOLC is not being utilized.
The wireline connection to the tower is what is beyond capacity.
When you get the fast beep, then the ACCOLC is being utilized,
And your phone is currently being restricted by the tower,
because their is no more frequency slots available..

Hope everyone will learn as much as I have off of this.

This also mean's the higher your number the more importance you may have

Goldcat 11-21-2008 07:54 AM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
Don't know if this means anything, but I am using Bell in Canada and when I checked my ACCLOC is was 5. My # ends in 5.

My question now is does Canada subscribe to this or not, I googled but could not find anything concrete. I am in a relatively rural area so I don't know if changing this will make a huge difference

Crank 11-24-2008 11:28 PM

Re: Common NAM Performance Tweaks.
 
is it ok to change the nam name also to whatever you want, im on a xv6700


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0