There's a MAP for that lawsuit

[thejacer]

it stews down to this: according to at&t they have 3g coverage everywhere. we all know its a load of bull but they can make that claim because 3g is a very ill defined term (some digital communications officianados still consider evdo and hspa to be 2.5 or 2.75g and not true 3g). Because 3g is so horribly defined at&t feels they can brand their edge connection 3g and get away with it. making the verizon commercials false advertisement.

i see one good thing that COULD come from this law suit: some actual criteria for the diffferent cellular commucations.

[gprimr1]

AT&T could also stand to improve their alphabet soup of terms.

We have TDMA, Edge, HSPSA, GPRS, UMTS, and GSM.

I've heard all of those terms used. None of them seem to be related to any others.