Sprint Terminates Complainers
 

From MSNBC:

NEW YORK - Sprint Nextel Corp, which recently launched an advertising campaign to attract new customers, is disconnecting more than 1,000 subscribers for calling its customer service lines too often and making what the company called unreasonable requests.

The No. 3 U.S. wireless provider with 53 million customers said on Monday it started sending service termination letters on June 25. Sprint said the cancellations involved 1,000 to 1,200 customers who had called the company about 40,000 times a month in total.

Now how’s that for customer service?

“Companies like Sprint sometimes do have to take a hard line, and that may mean canceling certain customers,” said Chris Denove of JD Power and Associates, a customer satisfaction survey firm. “But what I would caution Sprint is to look at the problems that caused these customers to call over and over again,” Devone told CNBC.

Sprint insists that the problem is not with its customer service in response to CNBC’s inquiry. Instead, it says, getting rid of the high maintenance customers will help it improve service quality.

"These customers were calling to a degree that we felt was excessive," said Sprint spokeswoman Roni Singleton.

"In some cases they were calling customer care hundreds of times a month for a period of six to 12 months on the same issues even after we felt those issues had been resolved," she said.

Singleton, noting that mass cancellation letters were not routine, said this call volume was 40 to 50 times more than average customer monthly calls. She would not say how often customers can call before being deemed too demanding.

The company also declined to say what percentage of monthly service calls the 40,000 figure represented.

Singleton said some of the cancellations involved customers who repeatedly asked for information about other people's accounts.

Sprint waived final balances on canceled accounts and gave customers 30 days to transfer their phone numbers to other wireless providers, she said.

"We're working very hard to improve customer service. That's our number one priority," Singleton said.

The termination letters started going out days before Sprint kicked off a nationwide "Sprint Ahead" ad campaign on July 1. Sprint's customer growth has disappointed investors for several quarters after its marketing message was criticized as being confusing and it had network problems after its 2005 purchase of Nextel.

Providers AT&T Inc and Verizon Wireless, a venture of Verizon Communications Inc and Vodafone Group Plc, were quick to point out differences between their policies and Sprint's, saying they very rarely cancel services.

AT&T, the U.S. wireless service with the greatest number of subscribers, sometimes cancels or restricts services for customers for "excessive data or voice roaming on other carriers' networks," according to spokesman Mark Siegel, who said competitors had similar policies.

Tom Pica, a spokesman for Verizon Wireless which is second to AT&T by number of customers, said his company sometimes cancels services for callers who are "extremely abusive" to its customer service representatives. But, he said, this would be handled on a case-by-case basis.

Industry watchers are surprised that Sprint would risk bad press just to economize on service to 1,000 high maintenance customers, a minimal fragment of its 53 million customer base, especially when the company is struggling to catch up with its competitors.

Disgruntled customers got their balances wiped clean, and were given 30 days to take their number to another carrier with no penalty.

“I am sure for some customers; they got exactly what they wanted from this,” said Denove.

Sprint shares were down 32 cents at $21.55 on the New York Stock Exchange early Monday afternoon.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19681390/

late,
Coz

Wow...40,000 calls a month? That's an average of 400 calls a month per customer... or just over 13 a day from each customer...I'd cancel them as well! I do realize that some of the numbers might be off and that Sprint probably did something to warrant some calls, but still...

It sounds like a win-win game. Sprint gets rid of high maintenance customers and those customers who had such many complaints are let off without paying ETF and even final month balance. Also the rest of us can expect improved customer service (somehow, I don't buy this line though).

I talked to a Sprint rep that was higher up on the Sprint food chain LOL, and they said there was a lot more to this story than what people are just hearing. The rep told me not to worry, that they aren't going to cancel you for calling in to much if you have legitimate problems. The rep told me that the customers that got cancelled by Sprint had called in many times trying to get free stuff etc... that there was also much more to it. The rep told me there was a pattern to all the people that they cancelled. It wasn't just people calling in with every day problems. They were abusing the system. That's what the rep told me anyway.

Funny, a long time forum member at sprintusers.com got nuked and she says she only called in because her bill was always incorrect, etc. I would never say Sprint is perfect, but I always believe there is more to something when someone says they CONSTANTLY have problems or they go through 4-5 phones in 6 months because none of them "work" right.

Right on. When I hear people complain about something not working right or the apache is a piece of crap because they had to replace the phone 4 times in 6 months I'm very skeptical it is anything other than the user. Same way with people complaining about customer service, in 6 years I have never called customer service for a matter other than a plan change or addition. But I believe a lot of people aren't on the internet nearly as much as myself....so finding answers for them might be more difficult.

Yeah I mean, get real. If you have that many problems with your Apache then get a new phone.. Or if your service is that bad, move to another carrier. Constant complaining isn't going to solve your problems.

You've obviously never been married :D

late,
Coz

u hit the nail on the head :D

I dunno, I think if you or your "other" is constantly complaining then it's time to move onto someone else as well.

nah some of us like that its a married thing :)

Can't say I have ever had a problem with Sprint service - they have always handled my problems/requests appropriately and I call about 5-10 times a year. And I have been with Sprint for over 8 years. Why do some people ALWAYS have problems????

Been with the wife for almost 20 years and she is still a keeper. I just learned to "tune out" when needed!

Been with mine going on 18yrs! and i fully agree with the tuning out part!...lol.

That's the thing, I am married...but maybe just not long enough yet! :lol:

LOL :D


ive been with sprint for 8 years and i love it :D

while I'm not a huge fan of Sprint (I left them for the big V), I think it's within their right to do so. These customers were causing them to waste money and probably abusing the system. (god, I sound like I'm drinkin' the Spring koolaid) :)

Well, Id be willing to bet they just got a list of who called most and just kinda wrote it off without inspecting the list for legit customers with real problems...

As stated above, It has to be a cloak and dagger op to get rid of all the people over abusing the system... Calling in and getting one discount added or whatever is not that bad, When your calling 5 times a day trying to get them to add stuff like FIMF to your SERO plan that already has the corporate discount and god knows what else on it... You need to get canned...

No disrespect by any means... 40,000 calls / 1200 customers = 34 calls per month per customer, or one per day. Point is... they still call way to damned much.

Nice catch. I feel like Michael Bolton from Office Space right now...just seemed to have misplaced a decimal or something like that...stupid!

http://www.whiterose.org/pete/blog/i...lton080105.jpg

"PC load letter"?!! What the %*@# does that mean?!!

http://trouble.philadelphiaweekly.co...e-space-05.jpg

That's what PC Load Letter means...

^^^^^^^^^^
:sign5:

MICHAEL
Wow, our last day at Initech.

SAMIR
I can't believe they had security escort us out. Not like we're gonna
steal something.

PETER
I stole something.

MICHAEL
Oh yeah. I guess we all did.

PETER
No, I stole something else.

SAMIR
What did you steal?

PETER
We'll call it a going away present.

************
Ok...I think we're getting a bit off topic...

late,
Coz

:laughing3: :laughing3: :laughing3:

Peter: So I was sitting in my cubicle today, and I realized, ever since I started working, every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life.

Dr. Swanson: What about today? Is today the worst day of your life?

Peter: Yeah.

Dr. Swanson: Wow, that's messed up.

:rr:

Back on topic...

All I know is I called Sprint recently.

Talked to one person (in India, of course).

They fixed my billing issue (they had me on the wrong plan).

I was expecting about $50 refund but got...lets say a couple hundred dollars credited to may account, so...

I love Sprint. lol

^Mal,

Someone is a lucky son of a b*tch. Maybe I should try to pull those strings on a, lets say, experimental level? Maybe I can get a "small" refund!!

-Reako

Sprint tactics...
 

Though my experience is second-hand, it's an excellent example of Sprint's tactics in the customer-appreciation arena.

My business partner had been a Sprint subscriber for nearly ten years and recently got a now-infamous letter from Sprint informing him that his roaming was excessive, that his calls to customer service were also excessive and that his service would be terminated.

I would be understanding if my partner had called Sprint customer service multiple times per day or if we lived in an area that wasn't covered by Sprint's network... but that is not the case. We live in a market saturated by Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile, Alltel and AT&T coverage... and he made fewer than one call per month to customer service (usually due to an inaccuracy on his bill).

While it is within any company's right to cancel service for any customer, it is far outside the bounds of good business practice to arbitrarily terminate customers that have been fully compliant with the terms of their service agreement. Nor would it seem to be in any company's best interest to disenfranchise their customers...

This is merely an observation and based wholly on a second-hand experience, but the facts are clear and indisputable. In a time when companies are dispensing with customers, it is encumbent upon customers to be wary of the companies they do business with and to remember that a company rarely (if ever) puts their customers ahead of the bottom line.

Re: Sprint tactics...
 

I doubt you're getting the trutth from your partner. Excessive roaming could be from his phone being set to use somene elses network over his carriers when given the option.

I've had both Verizon and Sprint and Sprint ha been far more willing to kiss my a__ than Verizon was willing to look at it.