![]() |
Re: Windows Mobile touch interfaces galore
Quote:
Would you rather have an OS that is rock solid as a backend so that phone manufacturers (HTC, Samsung, HP, etc) can skin it the way they like OR Would you rather have an OS that is rock solid including the GUI but not be able to customize it as much, put it on other hardware, etc. Edit - I guess I should've just started a poll, lol. |
Re: Windows Mobile touch interfaces galore
If I had those two choices I would go with choice #1. Since both items list the OS as rock solid I would rather have it be customizable. Basically if the manufacturers could custom tailor it that means it is modifiable.
That means custom user installations which gives you the best of both worlds. The reality is that we get a semi-solid OS that is customizable. The worst option would be a semi-solid OS that you are stuck with and you can't change at all. |
Re: Windows Mobile touch interfaces galore
Quote:
I give a lot of credit to Apple for its ability to create easy to use consumer products, but hate the fact that they give the early adopters the shaft. |
Re: Windows Mobile touch interfaces galore
Agree ^^^
I love Apples easy User-friendly devices, but they do just make the early buyers feel like crap. |
Re: Windows Mobile touch interfaces galore
Quote:
|
Re: Windows Mobile touch interfaces galore
Resurrecting an old thread because I just had a thought thats kinda related to it.
Why don't all these interfaces come with its own built in locking mechanism?!? Wouldn't that make all the sense in the world instead of having to try to skin other locking apps to make it look consistent? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com