seen anything like this before?? block all cellular radio activity

[boredandtattooed]

http://www.chinavasion.com/product_i...-blocking-bag/

put your cell in the pouch.. everyone gets a network busy or unavailable until you take the phone out.. kinda neat..

[boredandtattooed]

sorry, sorry, sorry... i had 2 tabs open.. one in accessories and one in TP2 forum.. my bad

[yupkitoki]

fyi cell phone jamming is a federal offense.. you get caught doing it...you'll have the Feds busting down your door.

[clueless25]

HAH!!! My neighbors do it out of fun, & they also listen to others..

Originally Posted by yupkitoki

fyi cell phone jamming is a federal offense.. you get caught doing it...you'll have the Feds busting down your door.

[cddmh]

Now I do have a device that will jam Sprint signals. I turn my Airave private and unless your number is listed, you will hear the message that you are in a private network, please back out and try your call again. LOL

[jethro_static]

That is banned in the US. Imagine somebody needs to call for an emergency.

[boredandtattooed]

Originally Posted by jethro_static

That is banned in the US. Imagine somebody needs to call for an emergency.

this impeeds nothing to call for emergencies... so what exactly, someone cant call your device?? i can turn off my device and accomplish that too... theres even websites now for all these new no texting laws, where one can set up an account and via text, block calls while driving, then text again to turn it back on...

this isnt really the same as cell jamming, not in the context of the law anyways.. unlawful cell jamming im pretty sure due to the legal language, means you have to "broadcast" a signal to jam.. this wouldnt be crossing that line by legal definition... ill see if i can find more info i suppose as im not the foremost authority

[jethro_static]

Originally Posted by boredandtattooed

this impeeds nothing to call for emergencies... so what exactly, someone cant call your device?? i can turn off my device and accomplish that too... theres even websites now for all these new no texting laws, where one can set up an account and via text, block calls while driving, then text again to turn it back on...

this isnt really the same as cell jamming, not in the context of the law anyways.. unlawful cell jamming im pretty sure due to the legal language, means you have to "broadcast" a signal to jam.. this wouldnt be crossing that line by legal definition... ill see if i can find more info i suppose as im not the foremost authority

You cannot call and receive calls. The Pouch does not only block phone calls, It blocks the frequency.Even on password protected phone, a phone that has no service can make an emergency call.
It says on the link you provided that the pouch will block ALL FREQUENCIES. all Cell Frequencies on the planet.

Jamming a cell phone is illegal in the U.S. Very illegal. And not just by ordinary citizens. It's illegal for theater and restaurant owners to jam (block) calls, and even state and local police or prison officials. The U.S., in fact, has the strictest laws in the world against jamming cell calls. U.S. law prohibits not only buying, selling, carrying or owning a cell phone jammer, but also posting a Craigslist ad that claims you're selling one. If you're caught with a jammer, you could face up to $11,000 in fines and up to one year in prison.

Some have called for the right to jam calls in movie theaters, hospitals and elsewhere. But others say that doing so would block calls in an emergency.

Source

You dont need to turn off your phone or your radio on theaters. Just need to silent the ringer.
You don't have a signal when ur 50,000 feet inside the Plane.


The only agency allowed to use jammers are the military for a reasonable cause.

Don't you even realize that the idea is so cool, U can only get it in China?

[mplsfalls1973]

I am not one to post like this typically but this is something I am interested in,

A theater could easily construct a inexpensive faraday cage during construction and remodels of theaters which would make it impossible to acquire a cellular signal. To do so would not be in violation of the Communications Act of 1934 otherwise known as Chapter 5 of 47.U.S.C. § 151 as it is only illegal to produce an wireless signal which interferes with another licensed service. Hospitals could do the same but they would not because of paging services.

You would have a signal at 50,000 feet as FM radio is line of sight and considering most cellular towers produce between 10 and 100 Watts PEP. The reason the FCC asks that mobile phones not to be used was because originally when mobile phones used 3 Watts of power they would cause problems with multiple towers considering the line of sight advantage, when digital communication became the norm the concern was one of channel reuse. The FAA was initially concerned about instrumentation issues which have been disproved using existing handsets. Several airlines are investigating the use of picocells pending FCC and FAA approval.

Regarding cellular usage, the Federal Government is allowed to block radio traffic via the National Security Act of 1947. I have been in numerous federal facilities where mobile phones were not allowed.

As for the case, who knows? All I can say is I appreciate the freedoms afforded to me by the Constitution.

[jethro_static]

Originally Posted by mplsfalls1973

I am not one to post like this typically but this is something I am interested in,

A theater could easily construct a inexpensive faraday cage during construction and remodels of theaters which would make it impossible to acquire a cellular signal. To do so would not be in violation of the Communications Act of 1934 otherwise known as Chapter 5 of 47.U.S.C. § 151 as it is only illegal to produce an wireless signal which interferes with another licensed service. Hospitals could do the same but they would not because of paging services.

You would have a signal at 50,000 feet as FM radio is line of sight and considering most cellular towers produce between 10 and 100 Watts PEP. The reason the FCC asks that mobile phones not to be used was because originally when mobile phones used 3 Watts of power they would cause problems with multiple towers considering the line of sight advantage, when digital communication became the norm the concern was one of channel reuse. The FAA was initially concerned about instrumentation issues which have been disproved using existing handsets. Several airlines are investigating the use of picocells pending FCC and FAA approval.

Regarding cellular usage, the Federal Government is allowed to block radio traffic via the National Security Act of 1947. I have been in numerous federal facilities where mobile phones were not allowed.

As for the case, who knows? All I can say is I appreciate the freedoms afforded to me by the Constitution.

Yo Yo, What I meant for 50,000 feet is above sea level. Meaning, Ur up there.