![]() |
Re: Bad camera photos
I understand it is frustrating to have such an expensive and a camera that blows. I have found the plastic lens on the back cover does degrade the image, however I would not remove it. In comparison to my Touch Pro I think the still images are far worse on the Touch Pro 2 but it appears the video capabilities of the Touch Pro 2 are far better then the Touch Pro. Since more often then not the image quality of the video on the Touch Pro 2 is better then stills, I believe that it is just bad software running the still camera mode. Ultimately though, I like the Touch Pro 2 best for what it true purpose it, communicating. My Touch Pro, girlfriends Iphone, and other phones that have better camera just lag in others area. One example would be the keyboard on the Touch Pro BLEW donkey balls so bad. My solution is just to keep a Nikon S210, which is a cheap point-n-shoot in my car for any time I want to take decent photos, such as pics on the beach, camping, ect. I use the phones camera only as a last resort. If I really need image quality I bring the big guns aka the Nikon D80 and 17-55m f/2.8.
...just my 2 cents... |
Re: Bad camera photos
Quote:
I'll say this for the hundredth time, just because its not a point and shoot doesnt meant it cant take good pics. They simply put in a low quality camera in there, I took this pic with a HTC diamond which has a 3 meg camera and look at the difference: http://i449.photobucket.com/albums/q.../IMAGE_006.jpg |
Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.80 (Windows Mobile; WCE; Opera Mobi/WMD-50301; U; en) Presto/2.4.13 Version/10.00)
Quote:
|
Re: Bad camera photos
cameras and bluetooth are thing htc has no right to touch
|
Re: Bad camera photos
I have seen some GOOD photos from the TP2 and I would like to know how they are getting them.... I am getting BETTER photos by changing settings on my phone before I take shots...
|
Re: Bad camera photos
HTC just slacked and put in a crappy camera. No other way to describe it. If that weren't true then we would at least have a flash. Not that having a flash automatically means the camera is good. But if they didn't even bother to put a flash on the device, then you know they went bottom of the barrel on anything related to the camera.
I'm getting sick of HTC's antics, personally. Take a look at this comparison: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdacomp...=1966&id3=2011 Where does HTC get off thinking they have a better product? They must really think the general public is a bunch of idiots or something. |
Re: Bad camera photos
Just like with the TILT 1 , I find that the lense cover is crappy , I know its a pain , but just like on my T1 if you remove the battery cover when taking a photo ,its 100 times better.
|
Re: Bad camera photos
Quote:
In regards to the camera itself, I agree it isn't as great as the TP1 but it's way better than what the mogul was. |
Re: Bad camera photos
I know the camera module is removable so wonder if it can be swapped with an Imagio or Leo, assuming they too have the same type. Then adjust the registry to compensate for it.
|
Re: Bad camera photos
after adjusting the settings as some have discussed I have gotten good pictures. I only miss the flash of the tp1 :)
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com