PPCGeeks

PPCGeeks (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/index.php)
-   Android On TP2 (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=179)
-   -   12/19: Need testers for kernel that can simultaneously battery save and overclock (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=138284)

manekineko 12-12-2010 04:53 PM

12/19: Need testers for kernel that can simultaneously battery save and overclock
 
Updated 12/19

bzo has created a new kernel here that needs testing:
http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread...39#post2016367

Prior to this kernel, if startup.txt was overclocked, pm.sleep_mode had to be set to 2, disabling power saving features and halving battery life, or else sleep of death would occur. This new kernel allows overclocked phones to set power saving pm.sleep_modes and should improve battery life for overclocked phones significantly.

If you can help test, and provide feedback if it worked for you, it would be very helpful so that the update can be submitted to the kernel team.

zeurx 12-13-2010 12:58 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
whats the default pm.sleep_mode if you do not define it?

arrrghhh 12-13-2010 01:48 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zeurx (Post 2012715)
whats the default pm.sleep_mode if you do not define it?

I believe 0...

Confirmed, 0.

butler360 12-13-2010 05:01 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
Is the speed decrease noticeable?

shikyo 12-13-2010 05:10 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
I have a tilt2 and I run Sleep Mode 0 with overclock at 671744. Thats 656Mhz. Short of the usual 768 I did but it gives me sleep mode 0 stable and better battery life... when its asleep. You know its fully asleep when the light turns green.

tpdjr 12-13-2010 05:19 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
so is the decrease noticeable at all when you overclock under 700?

zeurx 12-13-2010 06:02 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
Things take a bit longer to load like gmail but over all still snappy, and seems more stable. also battery is a lot better.

manekineko 12-13-2010 06:56 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tpdjr (Post 2012848)
so is the decrease noticeable at all when you overclock under 700?

The benchmarks showed there was a speed difference between overclock and no overclock, but I never noticed on in practice. Both are sluggish, I guess I'm not sensitive enough to detect the difference in sluggishness.

manekineko 12-13-2010 06:56 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shikyo (Post 2012840)
I have a tilt2 and I run Sleep Mode 0 with overclock at 671744. Thats 656Mhz. Short of the usual 768 I did but it gives me sleep mode 0 stable and better battery life... when its asleep. You know its fully asleep when the light turns green.

You managed to run both sleep mode 0 and overclock at the same time? Can you post your startup.txt? I'd like to try that.

zeurx 12-13-2010 07:01 PM

Re: FYI, overclock vs. battery
 
just leave the pm options out and run oc options... but this way 12% in around 6-7 hrs

Quote:

set ramsize 0x10000000
set ramaddr 0x10000000
set mtype 2292
set KERNEL zImage
set initrd initrd.gz

set cmdline "lcd.density=240 7x00.a11=500 msmvkeyb_toggle=off pmem.extra=1 gsens
or_axis=2,1,3 rel_path=andboot hw3d.force=1 acpuclock.oc_freq_khz=726000 physkey
board=rhod500 force_cdma=1"


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0