![]() |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
Yes, it will keep generating logs to be analyzed. You can re-run it as much as you want, you can even use multiple logs in the algo. What I'm wondering is how to stop it? Does it just perpetually take logs? I guess I'm not sure how this is going to be permanently implemented, there obviously has to be some way to automate the process... |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
Sorry I didn't specify the exact files in my instructions; I believe Nate just mentioned the generic "navipad.kl" one and you're supposed to grab the one(s) for your device. So save the 4 files that starts with rhod400_* for your Sprint TP2. In froyo.user.conf, add a mount --bind for each of those files, like the example I showed above. Hopefully that will work. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Any chance of the code being GPL'd?
Would be nice to export the logs and analyze them on a desktop PC... would definitely cut down on the .conf build time! |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
Not sure if BABS will be GPL'd, but the kernel code will be, don't worry 'bout that. Perhaps we can coax jonpry into giving up his x86 version :D. |
Any chance of gettn the changes and files in your rootfs so it can be pushed and used in a partition build?
Ie) init changes? Binaries, etc . . . :) |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
I ran the analyzer, but came back 45 minutes later to find my TP2 rebooted back into MightyRom. :angry1: |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
The code for scbs is here scbs in scbs - Gitorious
There is just a stupid build script for making it under ubuntu assuming you already have meschach installed. I'm sure it could be built for win32, but I haven't tried. I have a feeling the code could be made several times faster by removing meschach. At least it would be several times faster on x86, on arm novfp its not clear how much time is wasted with memory allocation because the math is just oh so slow anyways. I have limited data on the consistency of the numbers. From my own experience, the numbers i get all "work", ie my battery meter is always accurate enough that I cannot prove it to be wrong. But there is a great deal of variation in them. Say +/- 25%. That may seem like a lot but its really only -6dB of noise. It would be nice to get them more consistent, and i have some ideas on how to do it. But none of it is easy, and I wonder what the purpose of getting battery readings accurate to 6 decimal places really is. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Unrelatedly, just got hit be the connected-to-charger-battery-suddenly-drained-out bug. I'd really been hoping that one would have gotten taken care of by having more accurate readings on the battery meter. Battery drained down to nothing over the course of 4000 ticks of the log, all while it was connected to the charger, and had been connected for like 15000 ticks. Not sure if it's helpful for anybody, but on the off chance it is, I attached my scbs log. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
Yeah, I do seem to get hit by this annoyingly often, maybe once every month or two. It is solved by a reboot, though, which makes it seem like it might be a software issue, but at the very least seems to suggest it can be solved by software. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Manekineko,
Somewhere in this thread there is an explanation of the parameters. What scbs.conf were you using when this discharge happened? Do you know of the battery really did discharge or is it possible the readings were wrong? |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/android-tp...ml#post2087146 Battery really did discharge, when I turned it off, the light was orange indicating charging rather than green indicating charged, and when I rebooted into WinMo battery percentage was consistent with Android, indicating something like 2% charge remaining. Found the explanation you referenced, in case anyone else was wondering: http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/android-tp...ml#post2085359 |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Yikes, got hit by the bug again, only this time I didn't catch it in time and it drained the battery flat to the point it couldn't boot or charge normally anymore.
Twice in two days is a lot even for me, hopefully it's a coincidence to when I started to use the improved battery meter. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
e.g. `scbs -d -co /sdcard/scbs.conf -lf /dev/null` Here are the command line options... Code:
# scbs --help |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
jonpry,
I'm having a strange issue with scbs and was wondering if you could shed some light on why this was happening. I've integrated scbs into F22's latest rootfs and in /init I've integrated the following code, which starts debug logging and scbs Code:
logfiledate=`date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S`I tried starting scbs before the logging and after, and it makes no difference. I also tried some other things like having the script sleep for 5 seconds but the result is always the same. If I start scbs via gscript logcat does not blow up, so it seems like it might have to do with them being fired of in the same tty. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
Did i do something incorrectly? or is there a fix to this I am using a RHOD400 on BLAZN 2.2.2 Thanks |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
I solved my problem of scbs blowing up logcat by starting scbs as a service...
I created a shell script called scbs.sh and placed it in /bin Code:
#!/bin/sh Code:
-d -co /sdcard/scbs.conf -lf /dev/nullCode:
service scbs /bin/scbs.sh |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Before this SCBS, I used voltage as health indicator: 4.25V=100%
Now my Battery Monitor can't read Voltage, a fully charged battery return 0.100V What happened ? FRX06 + arrrghhh's 4/15/11 SCBS |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
wateverweber,
you haven't generated a model yet, so there is no conf file. Also 99% might be more correct than not. Thing is that charging starts to get exponentially slower after 80%. Afaict it can literally take days to get the last 1%, toadlife, Is there any particular reason you want to run it as a service? Atm scbs cannot be killed reliably, very bad thing can happen. For restarting we use killall -HUP scbs which just sends a signal to scbs to manage its own restart. Also for those trying to cookup a rootfs, there is a script in /sbin that you will need. Its called updatescbs or something. teemo, That is a known bug, still working on it. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/android-tp...ml#post2089505 The service I created only runs once and all it does it launch scbs. killall -HUP still works AFAIK. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Just checking, but once scbs.conf has been generated and placed in the root of the SD card, that's all that must be done to install a battery configuration, right?
I'm starting from a clean data.img, and I see in the boot text that the SCBS battery daemon is starting, just wanted to make sure I didn't have to do anything like run BABS again to get it to use the conf file. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Another question for you Jon. At what point do we have enough data to stop running SCBS? After a few weeks your software should have a pretty good model correct? Why would we want to continue running the software, which uses the phones resources and memory?
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
manekineko,
you don't need to run the app once you are happy with the model and have the conf. the daemon will startup with the phone and will take care of everything else. steveholtam, i suppose you can log to /dev/null as others have suggested, but the daemon still needs to run as it does all the battery calculations. I don't think it takes significant cpu to figure out the battery stuff, maybe a fraction of a percent. Imho the sdcard writes are not a big deal either. After all I use sd card as swap space. Others will tell you this is not sane. Its a matter of preference i suppose. Its probably a good idea to set the priority of scbs to absolute minimum. Its rarely going to be critical that the battery meter update right on the timer tick. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
It's possible to edit it directly on your phone, but it might be easier to download the file using droid explorer, edit it and re-upload the file. You have to remount your rootfs so that it is writable in order to change the file mount -o remount,rw / Set permisisons on the Remount the fs read only after you're done... chmod 755 /init mount -o remount,ro / If you are confused by any of the above, I would recommend you NOT do this. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
I'm trying to stop SCBS by using /dev/null via a terminal emulater. I have set rootfs as writable, but after running the /dev/null code as written above, I get the following error:
Cannot open device: /dev/scbs0 Anyone have a clue on what I should try? THANKS! |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
You should probably just leave things as they are if you don't understand what that means. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
If you just don't want the logs anymore after you've setup SCBS, an easy way is to add a line like this to your conf file at the end:
rm -f /sdcard/scbs.log* |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
I think I am getting reduced battery life because of the SCBS addition to the kernel. Prior to this, I would get to 5pm or 6pm before getting into the red. Since the new addition, I'm getting to about two hours less battery life.
If I can find the prior kernel, I'm just going to switch back. |
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
It definitely uses power, about 2ma by my measurements. I get about 70 hours on my 210.
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Not really. The kernel takes battery measurements every 5 seconds, while sleeping or not, and then pipes this data to the daemon which processes the numbers and computes a percentage. The percentage is then sent back to the kernel so it can be presented on the old interface that all htc libhardware's want to use. The measurements have to be fairly often to reduce noise. I really don't see the problem though at 70 hours it is a 10% reduction in life. With more usage, say your only getting 24 hours, its like 3%. At 8 hours its only 1.
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
Quote:
|
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system
The previous algorithm woke up every 10 seconds and re-computed everything.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com