Galaxy S Overclocked to 1.6ghz and fps cap removed..eats benchmarks for breakfast

[gTen]

AndroidSPIN | Your No.1 source for Everything Android. » Samsung Galaxy S Overclocked to 1.6GHz with 3 Forms of Proof

*drool*

[smu]

It probably eats batteries for breakfast, too. Come to think of it, at that speed it probably considers a 1500 mAh battery a light snack.

[gTen]

Originally Posted by smu

It probably eats batteries for breakfast, too. Come to think of it, at that speed it probably considers a 1500 mAh battery a light snack.

Nope..its an OC/UV..aka its actually more battery efficient then stock >.>

[sp4rtan5]

Is there a apk file to ovrclock it all in one with out rooring? Htc evo suxs btw.

[gTen]

Originally Posted by sp4rtan5

Is there a apk file to ovrclock it all in one with out rooring? Htc evo suxs btw.

Its not an apk, neither does it require root..its a custom kernel..for now its for the original galaxy s phones...its still at RC0..once it hits GA someone will port it to the Epic.

Their goal is to get the phone to 2.0ghz and 85fps which they say it "should" be able to do stable.

[Wunder]

Originally Posted by gTen

Its not an apk, neither does it require root..its a custom kernel..for now its for the original galaxy s phones...its still at RC0..once it hits GA someone will port it to the Epic.

Their goal is to get the phone to 2.0ghz and 85fps which they say it "should" be able to do stable.

I'm about as NOOOOB as they get with Android. What steps does it take to load(?) this kernel once it's available for the Epic?

[gTen]

Originally Posted by Wunder

I'm about as NOOOOB as they get with Android. What steps does it take to load(?) this kernel once it's available for the Epic?

Flash it using clockworkmod once its available.

[demonlordoftheround]

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile6.0) Sprint T7380)

Man this sounds cool.

[smu]

Originally Posted by gTen

Nope..its an OC/UV..aka its actually more battery efficient then stock >.>

Hmmm...I didn't see anything in that article to back up the claim that it's more efficient than the stock ROM.

[gTen]

Originally Posted by smu

Hmmm...I didn't see anything in that article to back up the claim that it's more efficient than the stock ROM.

Thats cause that article is just a press release..I read the actual thread by the devs who made it.