Original Touch vs. Diamond/Pro Screen
For those with access to both an original Touch and Diamond, please see this thread and reply there or here:
http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=174762 I am convinced the Diamond (and probably Pro) screen are NOT true 2.8" diagonal 4:3 aspect ratio like the original Touch, but I don't have access to both to measure. Thanks, Todd/Indy |
Re: Original Touch vs. Diamond/Pro Screen
Quote:
|
Re: Original Touch vs. Diamond/Pro Screen
Gonna make every effort to measure this for myself and post length, width, and diagonal here and at SU. I don't believe the Diamond/Pro are as large screen as other 2.8" PPC's that have come before.
Todd/Indy |
Re: Original Touch vs. Diamond/Pro Screen
ha..you made me curious myself, so i took my mogul out of my desk and snapped some shots
they are the same..they just dont have biga$$ bodies and black borders around the screen, like the 2.8" found on the mogul. http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b203/d94/DSC03173.jpg http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b203/d94/DSC03176.jpg |
Re: Original Touch vs. Diamond/Pro Screen
Gonna measure 'em in a few minutes. That pic makes the mogul screen look longer to me. I will measure the actual full screen video area length, width, and diagonal.
Todd/Indy |
The Answer Is...
There is a difference, though not as much as I thought. I measured the actual video area best I could "by eye". Here's the width x length x diagonal for the Diamond, Touch, and Q9c respectively:
1.67 x 2.22 x 2.75 1.69 x 2.26 x 2.82 1.45 x 1.94 x 2.41 So there is a difference, but not much ;) Todd/Indy |
Re: Original Touch vs. Diamond/Pro Screen
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com