Thread: WM7 Question
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2008, 11:37 PM
TurboFool's Avatar
TurboFool
Timeless
Offline
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,642
Reputation: 1112
TurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on repTurboFool is halfway to VIP status based on rep
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to TurboFool Send a message via MSN to TurboFool Send a message via Yahoo to TurboFool
Re: WM7 Question

I believe the point of the camera was to be able to support this function without requiring an accelerometer. I would assume for power consumption reasons, though, that they wouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth and ignore it if it's there. In other words, it'll support the accelerometer if it's there, but if the manufacturer decides to skimp and save cost, they'll simulate its functions with the camera.
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 1 times.