Quote:
Originally Posted by austin420
whatever eric. according to your own source, your wrong. your tmobile fanboyism is blinding you to facts. the fact of the matter is that the ieee said that wimax and lte were on track to the 4g pathway as they were upgradeable to lte plus and wimax v2. h+ had always been advanced 3g and tmobile just started calling it 4g with out permission from the group that sets the standard who decided to stiffle confusion let it slide.
i know thats a lot to read since its not about tmobile, but do you see how they dont even mention hsd/upa+?
wiki even calls h+ 3g multiple times...
so whats up eric? feeling froggy?
|
Your sprint fanboyism and T-mobile hate is blinding you to the facts, did you not see when I said that AT&T is also calling H+ 4G?
Quote:
Originally Posted by austin420
your missing my point. not that one is better than the other universally, its that eric makes up facts to suit his argument. thats all im getting at.
|
I make up facts? How about you changing a Wikipedia article to agree with you? And here's how I know, awhile ago I read an article that said that the ITU recently updated the definition of 4G to include H+
ITU redefines 4G to include LTE, WiMAX and HSPA+
That article is from 2010 how weird for it to not be on the wiki article?