View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2011, 04:35 PM
ndno's Avatar
ndno
VIP Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 421
Reputation: 3570
ndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIPndno is still contributing even after becoming a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system

Hmmm... I got the following results after 3 cycles (charged fully under FRX06 OCed at 650mhz, discharged with normally usage: some texting, some voice calls, a lot of browser surfing, some tapatalk, some youtube, a lot of sleeping in between)

cc=0.353938423
cb=115.441281066
rc=0.454638059
re=0.131118549
vf=1.098000000
cf=0312500000
lr=0.000001000
sl=7.535142851
se=0.007000000

Defintely do not resemble anything in the first post. Unfortunately, these values are Latin to me. The most current scbs.log file I have is 803Kb big. I have like 5 other scbs.log files (.1, .2, ..., .6) which I didn't include in the analysis, should I include them also?
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 1 times.