View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2011, 04:55 PM
horndoctor's Avatar
horndoctor
Suuuper Geeenius
Offline
Location: St. Louis, MO.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,764
Reputation: 8384
horndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the communityhorndoctor is a trusted member of the community
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via Yahoo to horndoctor
Wirelessly posted (htc Pocket PC: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.11) Sprint MP6950SP)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Recursion
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcthelight View Post
when i use it in a 1x coverage area it stops and skips in and out but in a 3g it runs perfect anyone know why
Yeah, 1x is limited to singly dimensioned data structures; whereas 3g provides 3^3 (27) dimensional data structures. This distinction comes into play during constellation mapping, and the algorithm employed to effectuate such data transmissions utilizes error-free (effectively) transmissions without the need to check for errors. Thus, no parity checks equates to faster asymptotic run-time. Additionally, the extra data normally needed for error checking in a singly-dimensioned data transfer situation is obviated, and therefore, actual data can be transferred instead of error-checking data. The conclusion is that 3g transfers data faster than 1x, and you don't have pauses due to waiting for more "music" data.

Btw, the conclusion is correct, the reasoning is totally made up.
LOL!
Great post!
__________________
Trombone players do it in 7 positions!
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 1 times.